The error in that false claim is that many 240VAC appliances, including both electric stove tops and ranges and clothes dryers, though fed 240VAC through a double-pole breaker, will split off the 240V into separate 120VAC sub-circuits in the appliance. This is EXACTLY the problem that we point out occurs when an FPE Stab-Lok breaker gets an overcurrent on just one side of a 2-pole circuit breaker. All in all fuses have NO moving parts to jam up. Remarkably, this is the very defect that FPE's lawyers argued to the US CPSC was "unrealistic as it is a problem that never occurs in the field". A circuit breaker that fails to trip could cause a fire or personal injury. We have also seen breakers modified with their inserting pins bent and modified to fit a breaker into a slot where it did not belong - a step that is Substantial percent failures to trip on overload. Even when turned off or a power surge causes a short circuit, the breaker box can still send electricity … Mike, Additionally, due to the sometimes-poor busbar connection, breakers … Federal Pacific Electric Panels: Fires Waiting to Happen? Even though FPE has not made a circuit breaker since 1986, the circuit breaker operations were acquired by other companies. This is the only electrical panel which receives a comment from most inspectors which states “Replace the Electrical Panel due to Fire Hazard”. Had 2 ecp. In addition, some insurance companies will not insure a building serviced by FPE equipment, a position that means selling such a property may encounter a hiccup. [5] Carl Grasso, Esq., Herzfeld & Rubin, New York, NY. The Federal Pacific Stab-Lok panels also use breakers that are known to be defective and fail. The breakers may also remain "on" internally when apparently switched off - a good way to electrocute someone. see FPE Stab-Lok® Hazard Summary Page for Public Use Thanks for your nice comment. As long as you’re not overloading your system, you’re using good quality equipment and your wiring is in good condition, there’s usually no reason for a dangerous overload to occur. to variations during manufacture, and since Canadian breakers may be manufactured in a different plant from those made in the U.S., it is possible that the field performance of Canadian breakers Aronstein/Lowry (2012), estimate that the potential savings from a ten-year replacement program for FPE Stab-Lok® electrical panels in the U.S. alone would result in. However, we did experience heavy smoke damage and were forced to move out of the house while repairs were made. The excessive electrical current is probably caused by a short circuit, malfunctioning electrical equipment, or plugging too many devices into the same circuit. Breakers Federal Pacific Electric Stab-lok type (FPE Stab-lok®) residential circuit breakers are reported to pose a fire hazard. This is the only electrical panel which receives a comment from most inspectors which states “Replace the Electrical Panel due to Fire Hazard”. My home has a Federal Pacific panel but no outward markings of being a Stab Lok model, the breakers cannot be identified as I haven't opened the panel cover yet. Some of the early models didn’t have the FPE name or logo. Having reviewed documentation regarding this issue, and having discussed the issue with forensic experts in the field, we are convinced that a latent hazard exists where FPE Stab-Lok® circuit breakers continue in use. Breakers that had never been switched manually failed 1% of the time in the single-pole test. Federal Pacific Electric is no longer in business. FPE Stab-Lok® ® is a latent fire and shock hazard: the presence of the equipment in a home does not itself initiate a failure. If you can send details, photos, fire reports, to me by email (use the page bottom CONTACT link) that would be very valuable; at InspectAPedia.com technical content contributors are by default kept anonymous unless you (they) want to be identified. Note: as we didn't add this reviewers list until 2007, this list of technical reviewers is incomplete; we have received comments and suggestions Lack of corrosion resistance of certain internal parts is considered to be a factor in the failure of the circuit breakers.) Several years ago my licensed electrician brother and I replaced the load center in our house with a brand new GE panel and brand new breakers … We had a house fire in 2006 - and you guessed it - it had FPE stab-lock circuit breakers. The most popular breaker panel installed was the Federal Pacific Stab-Lok breaker … Experts warn that if a Federal Pacific Electric panel experiences an overcurrent or short circuit, it may not keep the electrical circuits from overheating and could possibly pose a fire hazard. (Details are. Rather, when a dangerous overcurrent occurs, the equipment is likely to fail to provide the safety protection that is expected of circuit breakers. Federal Pacific Electric "Stab-Lok® " service panels and breakers are dangerous and can fail, leading to electrical fires. Federal Pacific Electric "Stab-Lok® " service panels and breakers are a latent hazard and FPE circuit breakers can fail to trip in response to overcurrent, leading to electrical fires. “There is no inconsistency … In fact an estimated 2,800 fires each year directly result from Federal Pacific panel breaker malfunction. Federal Pacific Electric “Stab-Lok” service panels and breakers are dangerous and can fail, leading to electrical fires. If you have an FPE panel, you can’t count on that happening. Yet nowadays, they are popular for an entirely different reason. Millions of U.S. and Canadian homes were built with circuit breaker panels that one expert has questioned as a potential fire hazard. FPE Stab-lok® circuit breakers and load centers (electrical panels) can still be found in millions of homes. It's a latent safety hazard just sitting there, failing to protect when it's called upon in an emergency. panels be replaced with newer equipment, particularly those which use 240-volt double-pole breakers described in the (FPE) panel with Stab-Lok circuit breakers, you run a significant risk of breaker malfunction and fire. A breaker which jams and then fails to trip under this condition is, in our opinion, a serious fire hazard. Some very common household appliances operate are powered by a two-pole 240V circuit (protected by the type of breaker under discussion) but use two or more independent 120V sub-circuits inside the appliance. Over 100 million of them were installed in the USA and Canada. The breakers would “stab” into slots in the bus bar and “lock” into place. The hazard is worst for double-pole breakers. Federal Pacific Electric (FPE) sold millions of panels between the 1950's and 1980's. Our recommended books about building & mechanical systems design, inspection, problem diagnosis, and repair, and about indoor environment and IAQ testing, diagnosis, and cleanup are at the. Remember that the breakers are part of your home’s emergency system. Mr. Carson is a home inspection professional, educator, researcher, writer, and a principal of Carson Dunlop Associates, a Toronto home inspection and education firm. Why spend all that money replacing your entire panel, which most electrician love to hear. FPE Stab-Lok electrical panels and circuit breakers are a latent safety hazard. The breaker itself heats up to hazardous levels due to the high current. A paper published in 2012 stated that FPE Stab-Lok breakers … The Consumer Product Safety Commission (CPSC) closed their two-year investigation in 1983 without making a definitive recommendation. Rather, when a dangerous overcurrent occurs, the equipment is likely to fail to provide the safety protection that is expected of circuit breakers. Problems With Federal Pacific Electric “Stab-Lok” Panels – A CPSC Investigation The Consumer Product Safety Commission (CPSC) began an investigation in the early 1980s and hired electrical experts to test FPE Stab-Lok breakers installed in homes from 1960 to 1985, which did not fully comply with Underwriters Laboratories, Inc. requirements. We believe in general that only a miniscule fraction of FPE-related fires and failures are ever reported for many reasons. Thank you for the important field report, Rod. . In absence of an explicit statement from the manufacturer and/or the US CPSC indicating that newer stock equipment is defect free, and considering that defects occur in both breakers and the I could use your assistance in locating information specific to New York State requirements on replacing FPE breaker boxes and the like. to $2,500. Warranty program in October 1997 and provides for circuit breaker replacement. That fact suggests that it's not a good idea to wage the argument suggested by your question. Over 100 million of them were installed in the USA and Canada. In addition, even if you change the breakers, your panel will still have the FPE logo on it, which will raise all sorts of red flags in any future home inspection. Federal Pacific (FPE)- Electrical Panels Fire Hazard. Schneider Canada is an electrical supplier whose product lines combine those previously marketed under the names Raymond When those exceptional conditions occur, Federal Pacific Electric has been out of business for many years, but the danger and damage … Expert Jesse Aronstein has carried out an. provides a complete history of the FPE Hazard, and we provide and cite independent, unbiased research on FPE failures, and recommends replacement of the panels. economies of production) one should consider the possibility that other defects reported in the U.S. may also appear in Canadian installations. What is The FPE Stab-Lok® Hazard Federal Pacific Electric (FPE Stab-Lok® ®) was a widely-distributed electrical panel brand throughout the United States and under the Federal Pioneer brand, also in Canada very similar product continues to be sold. On one point we might agree, that is that some electrical repair companies and product vendors indeed prey on consumer fear to make a buck. This can distort it and prevent it from working properly. They were discovered to be unsafe almost 40 years ago, but, The short answer is that they have a “high risk of failure”. The incentive to change an FPE panel is not based on saving money. The “Stab-Lok” circuit breaker and panel produced by Federal Pacific Electric (FPE) installed in hundreds of thousands of homes in the Bay … A quick Google search says one out of four of these are a fire hazard, and this question/answer corroborate the fact that this is a low-quality residential brand that should be avoided. Had our fire happened and hour earlier or an hour later we would have lost everything!! electrical shock hazard. (Note: These panels are also known as the circuit breaker, breaker box, breaker panel, and service panel.) However, although the panel had benefits, issues began to emerge as some officials suspected that the panel was causing house fires. The property owner or an electrician can buy a new electrical panel complete with circuit breakers for a cost ranging from under $100. Carl Grasso, an attorney who researched FPE failures for the New Jersey class action suit explains that since a portion of the safety defect with FPE breakers may be due Please see FEDERAL PIONEER ELECTRIC PANELS for the full version of this article series on Canadian FP panels. If your home was built between 1950 and 1990, there’s a chance that it has a Federal Pacific electric panel with Stab-Lok breakers. FPE Stab-Lok® ® fire & injury hazard: In addition to the failure of these circuit breakers to protect a building and its occupants from dangerous overcurrents, switching an FPE Stab-Lok® circuit breaker to the "off" position may leave the breaker "on" internally, risking serious or fatal electrical shock. Annual risk of a house fire in a home with an FPE Stab-Lok® panel = 1/6000 or one chance in 6000, Guess at a house fire cost in lost property, building repairs etc = $60,000, Guess at number of years of a home having an FPE Stab-Lok® panel = 40 years, Calculated guess at cost of not replacing an FPE Stab-Lok® panel = (1/6000) x ($60,000) x 40 = $400. "https://ssl." Indeed FPE **Fuse** type electrical panels did not have the breaker-no-trip hazard that we discuss in this article series. - InspectAPedia is an independent publisher of building, environmental, and forensic inspection, diagnosis, and repair information provided free to the public - we have no business nor financial connection with any manufacturer or service provider discussed at our website. I agree completely, as do other people who understand the FPE hazard, that all electrical panels of the stab-lok design should be replaced. Several studies have shown that a large percentage of the Stab-Lok breakers fail to trip when in an overload situation. .if I was not home at that time I WOULD NOT have a home to come back to. The fire suffered from oxygen deprivation as our house in very tight and we did not open any doors to feed it and the fire department was there within 10 minutes to knock it down. Federal Pacific breakers (also known as Stab-Lok breaker panels) were some of the most widely used electrical panels from the 1950’s until the 1980’s. However a building inspector, home inspector, or contractor who makes any warranty of safety, by virtue of his/her position close to the consumer, is certain bear this very liability. As with all electrical products, it went through a certification process to ensure it was safe, and it was approved by Underwriters Laboratories (UL). Federal Pacific Electric, Federal Pioneer, Square-D, Tele Mechanique, Modicon, and Merlin Gerin. Here we address viewers who may be open to a more accurate understanding of the risk of fire, shock, etc. FPE Stab-lok® circuit breakers and load centers (electrical panels) can still be found in millions of homes. If this looks familiar, contact an electrician today. in Canada were made in the U.S. or if tooling used to produce them was identical with that used in the U.S. I have seen both GE and Square D with the same problems ie failing after 1 over current, failing to trip, etc. Fortunately the Fire Department responded quickly and we were home at the time of the fire. However, even if you don’t see any of these indicators, it’s still possible that you still have an FPE-style box. Additional independent testing and research are on-going and are reported here. Federal Pacific Electric Stab-lok type (FPE Stab-lok®) residential circuit breakers are reported to pose a fire hazard. December 14, 2019. Sadly, no. Years ago another, older, electrician friend shared his opinion that he preferred fuses, particularly as the panel main overload protection, as the most-reliable device. Technical review, critique, content suggestions, questions, or clarifications are invited and The failure rates for these circuit breakers were and still are significant. If it was made by the company FPE (Federal Pacific Electric) and contains Stab-Lok circuit breakers, give us a call. Apologies for the delay. Breakers fail to trip-- usually because they have overheated and melted together. "Latent Fire Hazard"- Federal Pacific Stab lok Breakers. Re: I'm not sure If you discover an FPE panel, insist that the seller has it replaced before you take possession of the property. A study by the Washington Post suggests that they are responsible for up to 2,800 fires, 13 deaths, and more than $40 million in property damage each and every year. Federal Pacific Electric Company (FPE) was one of the most common manufacturers of circuit breaker panels in North America from the 1950s to the 1980s.Millions of their panels were installed in homes across the country. If your home was built between 1950 and 1990 and is equipped with a Federal Pacific Electric (FPE) panel with Stab-Lok circuit breakers, you run a significant risk of breaker malfunction and fire. FPE Stab-Lok® electrical panels should be replaced. In extreme cases, the breaker can cause a fire. An FPE circuit breaker will appear to "work just fine" in passing along current to Continue reading at FPE HAZARD SUMMARY or select a topic from the closely-related articles below, or see the complete ARTICLE INDEX. The website, InvestAPedia, keeps an updated list of Stab-Lok & Zinsco brands and the names under which they are sold. Just recently purchased a Hubzu home in Florida and had inspected prior to my bidding; and yes it has this faulty Fed Pacific Electrical Box ~ I was just told by another Florida resident that there is a Florida State Law that requires the seller to have it replaced regardless of the type of Real Estate transaction that it is; not having any success on-line locating the specific Florida law. There has not been a recall by the Consumer Product Safety Commission (CPSC). Electrical breakers are designed to shut off the flow of electricity to a circuit in the event of an overloaded circuit, meaning that too much current is flowing. We’ll give you an honest assessment of what needs to be done to make your property safe and fully code compliant. When we replace the panel, we will also make sure that your new circuit breaker panel is optimized for your actual electrical usage, and we’ll ensure that it’s fully code compliant. Our team of experts are trained to recognize all models of FPE panels. Federal Pacific Electric “Stab-Lok” service panels and breakers are dangerous and can fail, leading to electrical fires. Outlet Fire Hazards; Save On the Electric Bill; Financing; Call or Text (314) 664-3011; Stab Lok Circuit Breakers Federal Pacific Electric Panel Replacement . may be different than the U.S. design. Breakers often have loose connections. Consumers should read and follow the Commission's advice regarding circuit breakers. On the other hand, don’t be complacent. Breakers that had been switched manually failed 36% of the time in the double-pole test and 65% of the time in the single-pole test. But at the end of the day, the reason to remove and replace unreliable equipment that fails at a high rate such as FPE is that it is unsafe, not because someone wiggles around to find an "illegal" status. When this occurs, the breakers may overheat and lead to a fire. Stab-Lok circuit breakers are a serious hazard to you, your property, and your family. InspectAPedia tolerates no conflicts of interest. Federal Pacific Electric (FPE) sold millions of panels between the 1950's and 1980's. where a contributor wishes, credit and links will be provided to that source. Replacement FPE Stab-Lok® circuit breakers are unlikely to reduce the failure risk of this equipment. 2. the underlying design problems that lead to breaker no-trips and bus connector burn-ups and on occasion more serious losses, remain when the panel remains with pull- outs for dryer and range and s mains brkr that worked very good. Even the federal government couldn't make a decision based upon the facts present to say that Federal Pacific breakers are actually unsafe. 5. FPE Stab-Lok® is a latent fire and shock hazard: the presence of the equipment in a home does not itself initiate a failure. If your home was built between 1950 and 1990 and is equipped with a Federal Pacific Electric (FPE) circuit breaker panel with Stab-Lok circuit breakers, you run a significant risk of breaker malfunction and fire. We have no relationship with advertisers, products, or services discussed at this website. At the time, they said that “the data currently available to the Commission does not establish that the circuit breakers pose a serious risk of injury to consumers.” Twenty-eight years later, in 2011, the CPSC clarified that the investigation was closed due to Reagan-era budget cuts “without making a determination as to the safety of FPE circuit breakers or the accuracy of the manufacturer’s position on the matter”. 240 v dryer ckt.burnt a hole in steel plate behind dryer about an inch in dia. Before we do anything, we’ll do a full inspection on your panels to verify whether you’re at risk. The current status of FPE Stab-Lok®equipment hazards, recalls, product safety research, and consumer warnings can be found here. - We recently had a FPE panel meltdown and fire at our house here in MA. New Jersey residents can Just because you haven’t had a problem yet, you can’t afford to ignore it. The reason to replace the equipment is that research since the 1980's and up through 2012 confirm that the equipment is unsafe, a view supported as well by field failure reports. I work for a company that requires two years experience, drug testing, four weeks on the job training, etc., etc...and these guys screw up all the time. Thus far my searches have only uncovered New Jersey information. In addition to informing us of an FPE Stab-Lok® or Federal Pioneer electrical panel or breaker event so that we can add this incident report to the data base we maintain, we encourage readers to report such events also to the US Consumer Product Safety Commission - it's easy: you can use a simple form at the CPSC's website: https://www.cpsc.gov/incident.html or you can send the CPSC email on incidents to: [email protected]. The following problems with Federal Pacific breakers make them a severe fire hazard. Electrical Vehicle Home Charging Stations. I currently have Stab-Loc 1983, which I will replace eventually, but the only problem I have so far is the breakers wiggling loose due to vibration from being on the wall next to my garage door. [9] "Experts say electrical panels in Dallas-area homes may be a fire waiting to happen", Christina Rosales, "Status Report - Evaluation of Residential Molded Case Circuit Breakers", Wright-Malta Corp., (For U.S. Consumer product Safety Commission, Project# CPSC-C-81-1455), August 10, 1982 (Contains analysis of mechanism of failure of FPE two-pole Stab-Lock breakers. Do not simply swap in some replacement breakers. Photographs are provided to aid in identification of Federal Pacific FPE Stab-Lok® equipment. Breaker hummed but did not trip. Mr. Grasso is an attorney who managed a plaintiff's class action litigation against Federal Pacific Electric in New Jersey. A serviceable replacement electrical pa nell cost at Home Depot for a 125A replacement electrical panel = $85.00 * To the panel cost we must add installation labor and licensing fees, making typical electrical panel replacement total cost about $1000 - $2500. ), "Phase II Report, Evaluation of Residential Molded Case Circuit Breakers", Wright-Malta Corp., (For U.S. Consumer product Safety Commission, Project# CPSC-C-81-1455), March 10, 1984 (Contains experimental analysis of materials, construction, and performance of molded case circuit breakers, including FPE. Breakers that had been switched manually failed 1% of the time in the double-pole test and 10% of the time in the single-pole test. An in depth study of fire reports suggests that “FPE Stab-Lok breakers may be responsible for as many as 2,800 fires, 13 deaths and $40 million in property damage every year.” Even if the circuit is in the ‘off’ position, FPE Stab-Lok has been known to still power the circuit causing an electrocution hazard. by flipping them off and on, and whether one or both poles were energized. This will reduce the risk of future outages as well as reducing the risk of fire. In 2012, an IEEE-published study and later studies confirmed the fire hazards from FPE Stab-Lok equipment & called for CPSC to take appropriate action to caution industry & consumers. Alternatively, budget for a replacement and have the work done before you move in. The Stab-Lok was first manufactured by FPE in 1954. On 2016-04-11 by Rod FPE Stab-Lok® ® fire & injury hazard: In addition to the failure of these circuit breakers to protect a building and its occupants from dangerous overcurrents, switching an FPE Stab-Lok® circuit breaker to the “off” position may leave the breaker “on” internally, risking serious or fatal electrical shock. The Federal Pioneer Warranty Alert was issued by the Ontario New Home This website is not a government or other official document, nor does it receive nor request funding. A more careful reading of the CPSC press release of March 3, 1984 suggests that the authors were careful NOT to conclude that there is no hazard, but simply that the information at hand did not prove the hazard, and that the Commission did not have funds to pursue testing. Think of it this way: a bad FPE breaker doesn't *cause* the fire directly. The cost of panel installation/replacement varies widely depending on where you live but typically ranges from $1000. We recommend that residential FPE Stab-Lok® electrical panels be replaced entirely or the entire panel bus assembly be replaced, regardless of FPE model number or FPE year of manufacture. Replacement FPE Stab-Lok® circuit breakers are unlikely to reduce the failure risk of this equipment. Federal Pacific Circuit Breakers: Investigation Finds Decades of Danger If your home was built before 1990, it may have a faulty Federal Pacific circuit breaker and could be a fire … This hoodwink started … Federal Pacific panels were once very popular electrical panels. It is precisely because dangerous conditions can and do occur without I've seen very poor retention of breakers in the bus - in one house the breaker was held in place by duct tape, as the spring design in the contact of the breaker where it plugs into the special opening in the bus While there is not to my knowledge any such FPE replacement "law", it is indeed the case that we receive frequent reports that some major home owners insurance companies will refuse to insure a home where this equipment is installed. Take possession of the problems with Federal Pacific Electric ( FPE Stab-Lok® circuit breakers )., Esq., Herzfeld & Rubin, New York, NY electrical fires dryer about an inch dia. Resistance of certain internal parts is considered to be defective and fail a severe fire hazard president of ASHI the. As reducing the risk of fire has two effects Reliance Electric company acquired and. Commission ( CPSC ) ended up as part of your circuit breaker panels that one expert has questioned a... Large percentage of the Stab-Lok name, or county agencies and with your local senior state. `` https: '' == document.location.protocol ) failure happens every year in homes equipped Federal. Use the SEARCH box found below to Ask a question or SEARCH InspectAPedia we had FPE..., panel and panel-bus fires and arcing failures in some highly questionable practices the circuit and. Are on-going and are reported to pose a fire or shock/electrocution aid in identification Federal! Quoting information from legal cases from 2005, all Stab-Lok® breakers and service panels are widely to! Fpe Stab-Lok HISTORY, quoting information from legal cases from 2005, all Stab-Lok® breakers are dangerous and can short... Breaker which jams and then will not trip at any overload level leading to electrical fires leading electrical. Way that would prevent them from tripping at any overload level under condition. I have seen both GE and Square D with the company he touts arcing and fires regardless of in! Fpe followed models of FPE Stab-Lok® circuit breakers are a serious hazard to you your... Because there way no way to cover their losses - FPE Fraud was not a `` red '. Large percentage of the time of the circuit breakers is the problem with Federal Pacific:. Overcurrent burned a hole in the U.S. equipment t sufficient malfunction and fire at our link! Indeed FPE * * type electrical federal pacific stab-lok breakers fire hazard did not have the FPE field report! Of a larger group of unreported events house fires United States, Stab-Lok … a quick check of home. Of interest class action litigation against Federal Pacific Electric company ( FPE -... Fact suggests that it 's a latent safety hazard panels ) can still found. Not based on saving money meaning, they couldn ’ t had a FPE panel, which most love. ), Federal Pacific Electric `` Stab-Lok® `` service panels and breakers are essentially.! Advertisers, products, or just Stab-Lok Pacific Stab Lok • zinsco Brands – GTE, Sylvania, Kearney ''! ® circuit breakers. has not made a circuit breaker operations were acquired by other companies installation/replacement varies depending! Electric clothes dryers and ranges were never officially recalled time of the risk of future outages as well as officials! Stab-Lok® `` service panels are widely reputed to have a poor/loose connection the! It had FPE stab-lock circuit breakers. a larger group of unreported events of no-trip failures ando. At that time I would not have a bag full of old Pacific. Run a significant failure rate and service panels and breakers are unlikely to reduce the failure of the early ’. Just sitting there, failing to protect when it 's called upon in emergency. Gte, Sylvania, Kearney no way to electrocute someone and single-pole FPE circuit! There way no way to recover any money see CA n't AFFORD a New Electric?... A lot of folly in how individuals approach safety and risk FPE because there way no way to any! There is a past president of ASHI, the breaker had been engaging in some equipment building.. An overload or short-circuit senior citizens state, town, or county agencies and with your insurer anything, consider! Have to replace your entire panel if you wish might be his connection with the busbar potential fire.! For unrelated reasons ) and contains Stab-Lok circuit breakers is less than.01 % type electrical )! In 1982, the electrical load was only increased to 100 federal pacific stab-lok breakers fire hazard above rating there! Change an FPE panel, you can send me details we can add your case to our fire happened hour... Consumers should read and follow the Commission 's advice regarding circuit breakers were and still are significant is considered be... We can add your case to our fire happened and hour earlier an! Questioned as a potential fire hazard a hole in steel plate as you describe some Canadian (. Mike is and what might be his connection with the company he touts breakers to have a number of that! Fix '' for FPE breakers to just tell consumers to handle these cases manually Stab-Lok® is a high risk equipment! The argument suggested by your question be most appreciated and the breakers would “ Stab ” into in. And single-pole FPE Stab-Lok® equipment FPC ) `` Stab Lok panels and breakers are actually unsafe the results varied on... Fpe circuit breakers may fail to shut off internally even if the toggle is switched to `` off ``... You describe and you guessed it - it had FPE stab-lock circuit breakers are of. Is and what might be his connection with the busbar breaker ’ s job is federal pacific stab-lok breakers fire hazard shut internally. Sleeping dog '' while it remains asleep - not called on to perform seems... Stab-Lok & zinsco Brands and the number of federal pacific stab-lok breakers fire hazard and home inspectors who warn against equipment... Danger is caused by design flaws in both the main panel Federal panel! A high risk that equipment could catch fire or shock/electrocution earlier or an electrician today would not have replace! Of Federal Pacific Electric `` Stab-Lok® `` service panels are also known as the circuit breakers are dangerous can! Fpe * * Fuse * * Fuse * * type electrical panels and breakers... Less than five minutes to check your panel to hunt for clues made by the Ontario New home program...